Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
David R. Seaton v. Blake Johnson, et al.
Paid petition · District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 19-CV-85 · judgment March 3, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Should police brutality be constitutionally protected?
-
Do regulations ordering police to de-escalate confrontations instill an affirmative duty for police to de-escalate confrontations?
-
Does electronic evidence submitted by police override contradicting eye-witness accounts so dispositively so as to guarantee summary judgement as a matter of law for the government?
-
Should We the People adjudicate the use of state violence or should that be left to experts?
-
Should courts should continue to place their thumb on the scale in favor of the police over pro se litigants?
-
Should courts be permitted to ignore recent rulings of this Court? (0
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David R. Seaton
For respondent
Loren L. AliKhan
D.C. Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 28 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jun 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
- Jun 02 2021Waiver of right of respondent Blake Johnson, et al. to respond filed.
- May 12 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2021)