Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Brett Hendrickson v. AFSCME Council 18, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 20-2018 · judgment March 26, 2021
Before the decision, about 2.2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a petition filed soon after the judgment below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a Tenth Circuit decision below.
Questions presented
-
Whether a union can trap a public worker into paying dues without the “affirmative consent” required by Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018).
-
Whether a union can moot a claim that it has violated Janus’ affirmative consent requirements simply by establishing opt-out windows too short to reach appellate review.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Brian Kirk Kelsey
Liberty Justice Center
For respondent
Scott A. Kronland
Altshuler Berzon, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Nov 01 2021Petition DENIED.
- Oct 13 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
- Oct 08 2021Reply of petitioner Brett Hendrickson filed. (Distributed)
- Sep 24 2021Brief of respondent AFSCME Council 18 in opposition filed.
- Sep 24 2021Response to petition from respondents Michelle Lujan Grisham, et al. filed.
- Aug 06 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 24, 2021, for all respondents.
- Aug 05 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 26, 2021 to September 24, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 27 2021Response Requested. (Due August 26, 2021)
- Jun 23 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 17 2021Waiver of right of respondent Michelle Lujan Grisham, Hector Balderas to respond filed.
- Jun 14 2021Waiver of right of respondent AFSCME Council 18 to respond filed.
- May 14 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 17, 2021)