Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Kris Kaszuba, dba Hollywood Group v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2019-1547 · judgment August 5, 2020


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. Has the Federal Circuit erred in refusing to follow this Court’s Lexmark precedent, and in not applying precedent to standing under 15 U.S.C. § 1064.

  2. Has the Federal Circuit erred in allowing Intervention by the USPTO Director under 35 U.S.C §143 which only allows the Director to intervene in an appeal from a decision entered of the Patent Trial Appeal Board hearings and not an appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board which is the case in question.

  3. Whether Administrative Trademark Judges of the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, “who are appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director” pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1067, are, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, principal officers who must be appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Kris Kaszuba

For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Dec 13 2021
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Nov 23 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
  3. Oct 28 2021
  4. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Sep 22 2021
    Supplemental brief of petitioner Kris Kaszuba filed. (Distributed)
  6. Aug 30 2021
    Reply of petitioner Kris Kaszuba filed. (Distributed)
  7. Aug 04 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  8. Jul 16 2021
    Brief of respondent Hirshfeld, Drew in opposition filed.
  9. Jun 04 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 16, 2021.
  10. Jun 03 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 16, 2021 to July 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  11. Mar 20 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 16, 2021)