Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Bellflower Unified School District v. Fernando Lua, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-55912 · judgment October 26, 2020


Certiorari denied · June 1, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 6% cert probability (95% interval 4%–9%)

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Questions presented

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., requires that each Local Educational Agency (“LEA”) provide a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to certain eligible students. Petitioner is a California LEA within whose boundaries student K.L. resided. K.L’s parents unilaterally placed K.L. in a private parochial school located outside Petitioner’s boundaries. An Administrative Law Judge found Petitioner to be the LEA responsible for providing reassessments to K.L. and that Petitioner’s refusal to provide reassessments denied K.L. a FAPE. As a remedy for the denial of FAPE, the ALJ ordered Petitioner to reimburse K.L.’s parents for the costs of the unilateral private placement. The questions presented are:

  1. Is the District of Residence the responsible Local Educational Agency for providing reassessments, and coordinate provision of special education, to a student who lives within the residential boundaries of that school district but who was unilaterally parentally placed in a private parochial school located within another school district’s boundaries?

  2. Is reimbursement of the unilateral private placement appropriate where there was no denial of FAPE prior to the enrollment, parents failed to provide preplacement notice to the District of Residence, and the private parochial school provides no special education services and is not otherwise appropriate?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Richard Dale Brady
Law Offices of Eric Bathen

For respondent
Michael Terence Kirkpatrick
Public Citizen Litigation Group

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 01 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 11 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
  3. May 07 2021
    Waiver of right of respondents Fernando Lua, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Apr 28 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 7, 2021)