Felicia Ross v. Peregrine Health Services, Inc., et al.

Did the District Courts err by not allowing Due Process? Did the District Courts err by not considering the rights of a protected citizen in the rule of law when considering procedural due process? Did the District Courts properly exercise its ruling of Due Process rule of law considering Liberty? Did the District Courts err in not considering counsel? Why would the courts ignore the request for counsel, when in fact that was the court's reason for dismissing the claim? Under U.S.C 1915 (e) Defendants claim the case was dismissed. Did the District Courts properly exercise an unbiased ruling, toward a pro se litigant? Did the District Courts err, in 28 U.S. Code 1654 appearance personally or by counsel? Did the District Courts err, by dismissing Ross v. Peregrine Health Services et.al and allowing Ross's rights as a citizen to be taken away by a Government Agency, (RailRoad Retirement Board)? Should asking the Districts Court for counsel, under U.S.C 1915 (d) as a pro se, and the courts give no answer, to the request and dismiss the case, is that a Violation of Procedural Due Process? Did the District Courts respect the legal requirement that is owed to a person under Due Process Clause? Did the District Courts err when they overlooked deprivation of Life, liberty, Happiness, or Property? Did the District Courts follow equal protection under the law? Substantive due process