Joe Blessett v. Office of the Attorney General of Texas

Did U.S. Congress intend for Title IV-D Cooperative-Federalism 42 U.S.C 654(3) contactors escape private law liabilities for violating their 10th amendment protections under their contract with the U.S. government?

Did the Respondent forfeit its 11th amendment privilege by in failure to clearly make its intentions known upon a direct challenged by the PetitionerAppellant ("Blessett") in the trial court in 2017 and failure to protect its 11th amendment privilege before a judicial determination on March 6, 2019, in the 5th Circuit Court by its legal conduct?

Does the Texas Title IV-D program violate the "Separation of Powers" with state employees acting as contracted federal agents for the program and Texas state actors cloaked in state sovereignty at the same time?

Is it an overreach of "Public Law into Private Law Domain" by Title IV-D of the Social Security Act?

Does the Title IV-D program provide any benefits to the noncustodial parent?

Who is the primary lender on the interstate contracts in question under federal law?

Blessett challenges U.S. Constitutionality of the 42 U.S.C.658a incentives for performance as monetary inducement to coerce the 42 U.S.C. 654(3) contractors to increase performance revenues like any income-generating business and criminalize noncustodial parents?

Does federal statute 42 U.S.C. 658a of the Title IV-D of Social Security Act of the program help