Raj K. Patel v. Trump Corporation, et al.

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES I. Whether the Southern District Court of New York’s decision was arbitrary or unfair and violated Due Process, when denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b)(1)(B) permissive intervention, especially per United States v. Local 638,347 F.Supp. 164,166 (S.D.N.Y. 1972). II. Whether rules 24(b)(1)(B) and 8(e) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. require the Southern District Court of New York to grant permissive intervention or require the Court of Appeals to overturn the Southern District Court of New York and grant permissive intervention. III. Whether the legal capacity of Donald J. Trump in the happenings of the main case and in the happenings of the intervention are shared common questions of law or fact for permissive intervention to be granted.