Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Abdulmalik Mahyoub Mulhi Abdulla v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 19-1167 · judgment August 20, 2020

GVR'd · October 18, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Julie A. Goldberg
Goldberg & Associates

For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Nov 19 2021
    JUDGMENT ISSUED.
  2. Oct 18 2021
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of the brief filed by the Acting Solicitor General for the United States on August 27, 2021.
  3. Oct 12 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
  4. Sep 15 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
  5. Aug 27 2021
    Brief of respondent Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States filed.
  6. Jul 15 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 27, 2021.
  7. Jul 14 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 28, 2021 to August 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Jun 24 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 28, 2021.
  9. Jun 23 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 28, 2021 to July 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
    Main Document
  10. May 18 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 28, 2021.
  11. May 17 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 27, 2021 to June 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  12. Apr 19 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 27, 2021)
  13. Apr 19 2021
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.