Robert David Dupuch-Carron, et ux. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Does the ordinary meaning of the words of section 11(c)(1)(B)(i)(III) of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the NCVIA or “Vaccine Act”), 42 USC § 300aa-11(c) (1)(B)(i)(III), require that a person who received a covered vaccine outside of the United States be a resident of the United States in order to be eligible to seek compensation under that section of the Vaccine Act?

Does the ordinary meaning of the words in section 11(c)(1)(B)(i)(III) of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the NCVIA or “Vaccine Act”), 42 USC § 300aa-11(c) (1)(B)(i)(III), require that a person who received a covered vaccine outside of the United States had been present in the United States “While living and breathing outside of his mother’s body” before receiving that vaccine in order to satisfy Section 11(c)(1)(B)(i)(III)’s requirement that the person “returned to the United States not later than six months after the date of “ the vaccination received outside of the United States?