Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Carl Skidmore v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-15643 · judgment May 7, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
I. Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether a district court may deny a habeas corpus petition as “speculative” without conducting an evidentiary hearing. II. Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether de novo review of a claim of cumulative error requires de novo review of the underlying errors.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James S. Thomson
James Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law
For respondent
Gregory A. Ott
California Attorney General's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2020Petition DENIED.
- Aug 19 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
- Aug 13 2020Waiver of right of respondent Joe Lizarraga to respond filed.
- Aug 05 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 11, 2020)