Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Candace Aguilera, aka Candace Sgaggio v. City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 19-1398 · judgment November 18, 2020


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

I ask the Supreme Court to clarify how long the government agents, can stay on the Private spiritual property and continue to search, after the implied license to knock and talk to has been revoked. The 10 circuit applies two cases to shut down my spiritual free exercise claims by leaping over fourth amendment protections. In United States v. Carloss, 818 F.3d 988, 990 (10th Cir. 2016) consent was given and Carloss led officers to his room. In United States v. Shuck, 713 F.3d 563, 568 (10th Cir. 2013) nobody was even home. However in my case, I was present. I objected to the search not once but twice. Then I left my spiritual property because officers would not leave, and threatened me. Defendant Marshall Me Clarin became angry and threatened plaintiff I Candace Aguilera, “If you do not let us in, nobody will be allowed in”. (Doc# 01110251778, P.120) This case is almost identical to Sause v. Bauer, 138 S. Ct. 2561, 129 S. Ct. 315, 201 L. Ed. 2d 982, 172 L. Ed. 2d 229 (2018). The 10th Circuit will not recognize womans Spiritual rights. I am an indigenous woman born in the Farming community of Lamar Colorado. I am a member of a protected class under the 14th amendment. I don’t have an attorney but I do have Faith.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Candace Aguilera

For respondent
Bryan Edward Schmid
El Paso County Attorney's Office

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 30 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Jun 15 2021
    Brief of respondent Robert Mitchell in opposition filed.
  4. May 17 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 16, 2021.
  5. May 14 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 17, 2021 to June 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Apr 13 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)