Glenn Galvan v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

QUESTIONS FOR THE SUPREME COURT

1. Whether all Nevada Courts abused their discretion and made errors in fact and in misapplying the court rules by not ruling if the State Court Proceedings are DEFECTIVE and are improper before the court as Nationstar violated numerous court rules which prejudiced the Galvan in conducting his case?? This deprives Galvan of procedural due process as mandated Nevada’s Constitution and 5th and 14th Amendments of the US. Constitution regarding procedural due process of property.

2. Whether the Nevada Appeals Court made errors in fact in applying Nevada law and federal law [18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(l)(2)] by deeming Galvan in lacking in standing where the Appeals Court deemed the mortgage assignment "voidable’ ?? Nevada law NRS 107 [Deed of Trusts], federal court rulings and law, and the William’s Test state otherwise, to be “void”. The ruling violates and deprives Galvan the fundamental constitutional rights of substantive due process in Nevada’s Constitution and 5th and 14th Amendments of the US. Constitution regarding procedural due process of property.

3. Whether the Nevada State Courts has abused their discretion by setting aside end/or not considering facts and findings of the Consent Orders/Decrees issued by the Office of Thrift and Supervision regarding Aurora Loan Services and 1999 MERS Corporation pursuant to 12 USC § 1818(i)(l)?? The affidavits signed by these parties [Nationstar, Aurora] for this case lack trustworthiness. These were the bases of the Galvan’s preliminary injunction in which the lower court denied. Appeals Court and Nevada Supreme Court let the lower court ruling stand.