In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam

iii repudiating Government-issued patent grant contracts without just compensation to the inventor, as declared by Chief Justice Marshall in Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819), Grant v. Raymond (1832), Fletcher v. Peck (1810) — the Law of the Case. My inventions are the backbone of the nation’s economy, power national security and have enabled the nation to work remotely during COVID. Examples of my IoT machines are the millions of Web Apps in Apple’s App Store in Apple’s iPhone, in Google Play in Android devices, Web banking Web Apps, healthcare Web Apps, Fitbit, Zoom, Facebook, Twitter, social networking Web Apps, to name a few. QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Whether denial of my fundamental right to protection provided by the law, denial of my rights to private property, personal security, health, reputation, and denial of access to the Court to seek redress for my rights, in violation of the 1st, 5th, 7th, 8th and 14th Amendments grounded in substantive Due Process, 42 U.S.C.§ 1983, and 18 U.S.C. §§241, 245, 249, warrants this Court to provide the remedy long due to me, a disabled 73- year old female citizen of color.

2. Whether deprivation of rights of liberty, private property, and personal security (consisting of legal and uninterrupted enjoyment of life, limbs, body, health and reputation) of a disabled elder female