Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Audrey L. Kimner v. Web Watchers, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-15343 · judgment October 29, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
ii
-
Whether the Supreme Court finds it appropriate by law, The United States Constitution and Federal Rule 60 to VACATE all attached federal orders in case No. 20-15343 and No. 5:19-cv-06973 due to violations of petitioners First Amendment Rights, which reflects VACATED orders by Honorable Magistrate Nathanael Cousins and denied petitioners Rights under 28 U.S.G.§ 636 ©. Note: Petitioner overnighted a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court one day prior to any knowledge of a Mandate order in this case, Writ submitted by United States mail date of November 30, 2020, and resubmitted on December 19, 2020 to date per court clerks request.
-
Whether the California District Court in San Jose and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Intentionally and willfully deprived petitioner of all Rights under 18 U.S.C. § 242, denying Equal Protections under the law while ignoring a pattern over ten years of multiple Federal offenses and Constitutional violations by all Respondents with new case law by an Honorable Ohio Sixth Circuit Court judge.
-
Whether the California Courts failed to acknowledge multiple violations of No Due Process by holding petitioner against petitioners will under a false bench warrant concerning Petitioners home contract against an irrevocable Binding Arbitration award while failing to offer petitioner Procedural Due Process from October 2019 to date, nor any resolve or assistance, as petitioner is a victim of assault and financial abuse.
-
Whether petitioner was intentionally denied a trial by jury against petitioners Sixth Amendment Right.
-
Whether the District Court judge and the Ninth Circuit judge’s intentionally retracted Petitioners Forma Properous in retaliation for filing an appeal, vilified petitioner in court Orders stating petitioner filed a frivolous complaint and a malicous litigant while ruling In error of Rooker Feldman Doctrine on speculation, not Federal law or Constitutional Violations with no hearing against petitioners Right to be heard under The United States Constitution.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Audrey L. Kimner
For respondent
Morris Dawes Cooke Jr.
Barnwell Whaley Patterson & Helms
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Aug 23 2021Rehearing DENIED.
- Jul 29 2021DISTRIBUTED.
- Jun 15 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- May 24 2021Petition DENIED.
- May 04 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
- Apr 26 2021Waiver of right of respondent Suzanne Groff to respond filed.
- Dec 01 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2021)