Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Wael Lasheen v. Supreme Court of Ohio

Paid petition · Supreme Court of Ohio, No. 20-AP-075 · judgment September 11, 2020

Certiorari denied · May 24, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

1-Can a case proceed if the petitioner argues that the administrative judge, appointing judges to the petitioner’s case, lacked jurisdiction to do so without having his petition of lack of Jurisdiction addressed? 2-Did the Ohio Supreme Court err when they declared that Administrative Judges are not subject to disqualification under Ohio Revised Code (O.R.C). 2701.03? Therefore is the O.R.C. 2701.03, as interpreted by the Ohio Supreme Court, unconstitutional? 3-Was the petitioner given the opportunity to be heard by the Ohio Supreme Court on every question involving his rights and interests, in their September 11th, 2020 decision?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Wael Lasheen

For respondent
—

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 24 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 04 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
  3. Feb 08 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2021)