Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Roger D. White v. Super Gasoline, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 191752 · judgment May 26, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Where the trial court engages in tainting a jury (especially during voir dire) making it clearly pro-defense by punishing pro-plaintiff potential jurors and impanelling pro-defense potential jurors, also creates a non-diverse jury (all white and all women), and removes the only black member of the jury, does this violate Mr. White's guarateed right to a fair trial and and an impartial jury under the Due Process Clauses of the 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Roger D. White
For respondent
Sanford A. Friedman
Law Office of Sanford Friedman, LLC
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, May 3, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- May 03 2021Petition DENIED.
- Apr 14 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
- Apr 01 2021Waiver of right of respondent Super Gasoline, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
- Mar 02 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)