In Re Ivan Rene Moore, et al.

ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW

1. Shall a writ lie for violation of due process because the California Supreme Court violated its own Constitution by allowing one department of the Superior Court to contemporaneously overrule another department in the same matter ?

2. Were the Petitioners denied due process and their right to redress by the Supreme Court of California when it affirmed the decision of the California Court of Appeals allowing the trial court to dismiss the Petitioners’ entire action without notice and a hearing?

3. Were the Petitioners denied due process and equal protection when the California Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s judgement, ignoring their published opinion in Martin-Bragg vs. Moore 219 Cal App 4th 367 (2013), and the rulings of two other judges who found that Petitioner Moore had a beneficial interest in his Shenandoah home because he and only he paid the mortgage, taxes and improvements on his Shenandoah home for over twenty years?

4. Were Petitioners’ denied due process and right to possess and enjoy and property and practice their profession using their professional property, when the California Supreme Court affirmed the denial of their Constitutional right by upholding Judge Johnson’s denial of the return of their adjudged converted property, leaving it in the hands of the converter Martin-Bragg?