Robert Fusco v. Tony Mays, Warden

■ Questions Rfesnled c P&lifloors §^25H as unhmf ly (pc*. Mo. I 2) kjhich f on fitch luit-b rlea stem of nfher apprllak rrnCh of) i~he surne Mar bof tilso 11.S Iauo u/uhr ?8 li.S-C $22^ W(0(k) The flak. on UJ hich fhz impeditfe^ to filmy on apphrahort (\pq\led hi) sLk fjfh(/) in violation nf till ron^fhho/) of Ifloi) of fill UflikJ. f>Lt& is cmotird j if lb. Cifphcafii- UfxS pfnJQnkd frozen fdtny bij such sfafe arhon — Hu twfwltmnf teiiOCt fhi fr/npkte lossJripshdLhon hr) Pnso/i {Ifftea!s of Po se M wfttrs IlyJ ffl&iknal Mrl fropprfj rJunnj hi 5 haAsfer h fh(££ ^pftfrah pciV/lS tvi[h/) hour (Wnncl set ar^dpmrf) 2) IJhg.jjipr Hip Disfnof r fluff one! /fyypals rnarf rrrgj in l\k uodor^knclmcj of -he foifs a/id submissions pwnhd bu P10 % PAihonpr and fk nnCe.ato/\cAie. Q^lirahofl of eskblishfcl row, lau) ujhirh flofnnly ronfhch u;i!4i flms couff 1/)J~ 0Mip,r ffjurh on Wig Somi. 1 ssui — louJnere fine fomplok loss rLshurfton se Pe.hhoton legal mnaknctI is exka ordinary as a Maker of lauj and is plain\ij preuenhcL from ft id 3 an\j pleading f(K scm0 Utne (OlecM see fifuxMr y