Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

James W. Robertson, Sr. v. Intratek Computer, Incorporated

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 19-50792 · judgment October 2, 2020


Certiorari denied · May 16, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Under 41 U.S.C. § 4712, employees of government subcontractors may not be retaliated against for reporting violations of laws, rules, or regulations related to the competition for or negotiation of a federal contract. 41 U.S.C. § 4712(a)(1). In section (c), titled “Remedy and Enforcement Authority,” the statute provides a very specific scheme of rights and remedies and how to enforce them, including a private cause of action in federal court, district court enforcement of agency orders, and appellate review. Id. at § 4712(c). The final subsection of section (c) states: “The rights and remedies provided for in this section may not be waived by any agreement, policy, form, or condition of employment.” Id. at § 4712(c)(7). The Questions Presented are:

  1. Does mandatory compelled arbitration of claims under 41 U.S.C. § 4712 disrupt the administrative scheme set up by Congress to remedy and enforce violations of 41 U.S.C. § 4712?

  2. Did Congress intend to prohibit enforcement of mandatory employment arbitration agreements in 41 U.S.C. § 4712, even if the statute does not expressly refer to arbitration, when it (a) expressly provided for a federal trial in the remedy and enforcement section and (b) expressly prohibited waiver of any rights and remedies provided as a condition of employment?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert Joseph Wiley
Rob Wiley, P.C.

For respondent
Jacob Charles Cohn
Gordon & Rees

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. May 16 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 26 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
  3. Apr 22 2022
    Supplemental brief of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed)
  4. Apr 11 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
  5. Oct 04 2021
    The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
  6. Jul 21 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  7. Jul 20 2021
    Reply of petitioner James W. Robertson, Sr. filed. (Distributed)
  8. Jul 02 2021
    Brief of respondent Intratek Computer, Incorporated in opposition filed.
  9. May 27 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 2, 2021.
  10. May 26 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 2, 2021 to July 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  11. May 03 2021
    Response Requested. (Due June 2, 2021)
  12. Apr 21 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
  13. Mar 01 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2021)