Michael Ramon Ochoa v. Erin Rubin

The questions posed in the preceding course of appellate actions should be regarded as if entered here in their entirety.1 Is Exhibit G. Oklahoma Conversations a complete, consistent and coherent model of the facts of this case? Were those facts already cognizable to this Court and to federal law enforcement de jure? de facto? Do the service history as well as the content of 11-07-16 Motion for Custody and Relief demonstrate a "legitimate purpose" per 22 O.S. §60? Were U.S. Constitution Article IV Section I and Amendment I adequately raised before both the trial and appellate courts between 11-07-16 and 11-07-20? Were my words and deeds those of a malicious and dangerous, ex-spouse? Or those of the proudest "Sooner" parent protecting my beloved nifias perdidas? Does a search of the Linearized Root Data for "Hispanic" or "Mexican" reveal any elements of race or gender profiling in this case? Did the conviction and removal of Judge Kendra Coleman for "oppression in office" prejudice the final disposition of this case? 1 See attached exhibit H. Questions orAnoQtaa