Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Demetrius William Edwards, et al. v. Sherry Burt, Warden, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 19-1302, 19-1304 · judgment August 5, 2020
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a Sixth Circuit decision below, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
During an overnight recess in Demetrius Edwards’s and Bryant Royster’s bench trial, the judge made an independent, nighttime visit to the crime scene, unbeknownst to and unaccompanied by their attorneys. He did so to see what the night light looked like. This Court has “uniformly” found constitutional error without requiring prejudice when defendants are deprived of counsel during a critical stage of criminal proceedings. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 659 n.25 (1984). And this Court has already clearly established the law at issue in this case: deprivation of counsel “during a long overnight recess in the trial” requires reversal, without showing prejudice. Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 91 (1976). The state court required prejudice, however, and so upheld the convictions, and the Sixth Circuit denied habeas relief despite this Court’s clearly established precedent to the contrary. The question presented is: whether a criminal defendant who was deprived of counsel during a critical stage of his trial, thereby giving rise to a presumption of prejudice, is entitled to habeas relief. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Alan Evan Schoenfeld
Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr, LLP
For respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud
Michigan Department of Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jun 28 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jun 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
- Jun 08 2021Reply of petitioners Demetrius William Edwards and Bryant Lamont Royster filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 02 2021Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.
- Jun 02 2021Brief of respondents Sherry Burt, Warden, et al. in opposition filed.
- Apr 22 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 2, 2021.
- Apr 21 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 3, 2021 to June 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
- Apr 02 2021Response Requested. (Due May 3, 2021)
- Mar 24 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
- Mar 19 2021Waiver of right of respondent Sherry Burt, Warden to respond filed.
- Feb 26 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)