Daniel Kristof Lak v. California, et al.

Whether a state can be shielded from suit in federal court via 11th Amendment immunity in actions brought pursuant to Title IV-D of the Social Security Act when (i) Congress has clearly abrogated state immunity, (ii) when Section 5 of the 14th Amendment limits the state’s immunity, (iii) when a private right of action arises under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, (iv) the state has consented to suit, and (v) the state has voluntarily invoked the jurisdiction of the federal courts for suits brought under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act?

Whether a Plaintiff has complied with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when Plaintiffs original complaint, although complex and voluminous, is otherwise presented in a simple and plausible manner?