Marilynn Thomason v. Beneficial Financial I Inc.

Petitioner’s request for a Writ of Certiorari comes from a dismissal of an appeal, before briefing could be properly completed and through the direct acts of the Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court refusal to recuse, with cause for illegal acts and bias towards Petitioner, culminated in his direct act to ignore its own rules of appeal, thereby facilitating in directly causing the lower court’s refusal to provide timely requested and paid for court records and indexes. The questions presented are; Whether any State Supreme Court, state appellate court, state district court and/or any clerk of such court has the constitutional and statutory authority to arbitrarily deny a party their legal rights to a full and complete disclosure of timely requested and paid for court records pertinent to an appeal that directly and deliberately prevents and denies a party from being able to complete its briefings and denying a party the ability to submit a brief with the required citations to lower court filing indexes?