Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Shelby L. Haynes, et al. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 19-2589 · judgment July 20, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Can an ERISA plan fiduciary assert equitable lien by agreement claims against persons with which it has no agreement?
-
Can the undisclosed conditions subsequent of an ERISA plan be applied retroactively against individuals with whom the ERISA plan administrator has no agreement?
-
Where a summary plan description omits an ERISA plan’s common fund-negating language, under what circumstances does the common fund rule operate?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Alan Yaklevich
Moore & Yaklevich
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 26 2021Petition DENIED.
- Apr 07 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
- Dec 15 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 24, 2021)