Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A19-1816

Certiorari denied · October 5, 2020

Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

The first question presented is whether existing judicial procedures and standards are adequate to protect individual constitutional rights. The second question presented is whether the court erred in declining to grant a writ of prohibition. The third question presented is whether the court erred in declining to find the underlying orders and judgment void. The fourth question presented is whether the court erred in its determinations relating to the deemed dismissal rule.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jerald A. Hammann

For respondent
Kristina H. Kaluza
Dykema Gossett, PLLC

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

Oct 05 2020
Petition DENIED.
Aug 26 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
Aug 07 2020
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
Jul 15 2020
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2020)