Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam
Paid petition
Certiorari denied · April 19, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
- Whether Justice Barrett, as the last standing Justice with original jurisdiction, with the same duty and oath as the lower courts to enforce the Supreme Law of the Land — this Court’s own stare decisis Mandated Prohibition from repudiating Government-issued patent grant contracts, declared in Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819), Grant v. Raymond (1832), Fletcher v. Peck (1810), must accept and grant this petition for writ of mandamus, in the interest of justice, whereas: Chief Justice Roberts recused, seven Justices lost subject matter jurisdiction, and failed in their ministerial duty to enforce Dartmouth College and Fletcher, whereby the courts and USPTO adversely dominated the process to prevent Dartmouth College and Fletcher from ever coming before this Court, leaving the inventor with rights and no remedy, in violation of the Separation of Powers1 and Contract Clauses of the Constitution. 1 Congress enacted the America Invents Act (AIA) for the Executive Branch (USPTO) to perform the function of the Judiciary by USPTO’s unconstitutionally appointed judges (APJs) in violation of the Separation of Powers and Contract Clauses and Appointments Clause of the Constitution— in contempt of the Mandated Prohibition of the Constitution — AGAINST REPUDIATING GOVERNMENT ISSUED PATENT CONTRACT GRANTS stare decisis Governing Supreme Court Precedents, as declared by Chief Justice Marshall — to fast-
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lakshmi Arunachalam
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 19 2021Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Mar 24 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
- Mar 12 2021Waiver of right of respondents United States, et al. to respond filed.
- Feb 01 2021Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due March 15, 2021)