Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Walter N. Strand, III v. United States

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2019-1016 · judgment March 3, 2020


Certiorari denied · December 7, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 5% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a Federal Circuit decision below.

Question presented

In the wake of World War II, Congress established corrections boards for military records to help ensure that military members had a way to seek relief from harsh outcomes in the military justice system that hampered their reintegration into civilian life. In establishing the boards, Congress required service secretaries to “act[] through boards of civilians” to correct the records of servicemembers. 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a)(1). These boards receive tens of thousands of applications every year from servicemembers seeking record corrections. Currently, there is a split in authority over whether the statutory language requiring the Secretary of a military department to “act[] through boards of civilians” permits the Secretary to overrule a Board’s decision that is supported by the record. The question presented is whether the Secretary of the Navy, is “acting through” the Board for Correction of Naval Records as required by statute when he reweighs evidence and sets aside a decision of that Board that was supported by substantial evidence.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lucas Taylor Hanback
Rogers Joseph O'Donnell P.C.

For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Dec 07 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 17 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
  3. Oct 30 2020
    Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
  4. Sep 24 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 30, 2020.
  5. Sep 23 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 1, 2020 to October 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Aug 13 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 2, 2020 to October 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Aug 13 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 1, 2020.
  8. Jul 29 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 2, 2020)