Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sedfrey M. Linsangan v. Alice M. Taijeron, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-15103 · judgment August 24, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Is there anything else that I need to suffer or injure in order to qualify for the standing issue?
-
How could I live the quality of life that I desire if I cannot pursue my happiness in serving the people because Guam laws substantially burdened me and other people to run for office?
-
Did the court misinterpret the First Amendment of the Constitution the way it is written by creating a policy or requirement on grievances and Section 2 of Article III Constitution?
-
Am I not exempted for the three (3) elements of standing since Guam laws took away some of my constitutional rights and deprived me of my rights and privileges and therefore should not be a law?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Sedfrey M. Linsangan
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Linked docket
20M47
Proceedings
- Apr 19 2021Petition DENIED.
- Mar 24 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
- Jan 25 2021Motion (20M47) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
- Jan 06 2021MOTION (20M47) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
- Oct 28 2020Motion (20M47) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
- Oct 28 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)