Jean Coulter v. Philip A. Ignelzi, et al.

This year will be remembered by the images of several major Natural Disasters - including the refrigerated trucks holding victims of COVID-19 as well as the orange glow of the skies of California from the massive wildfires. There are also tragic images of Man-Made Disasters, including Body-Cam videos of killings at the hands of Law Enforcement and of course the massive World-Wide Protests of such examples of Police Brutality. Quickly though, attention shifted from exclusively the individual acts of brutality, to how the entire “system” has become so corrupt - as months ago, attention began being directed at local Prosecuting Attorneys and their role in the violation of Rights by members of the Justice System. Soon (perhaps with that same speed and intensity) the full-extent of the corruption of our Justice System will be exposed! This case concerns the “Justice System’s” promulgates an Unconstitutional Rule of Court - in order to shield members of the “Just Us System” from the civil repercussions of their entirely improper (and too frequently, criminal) activities - and the resulting Unconstitutional Order(s) directed against Coulter. a. QUESTIONS PRESENTED________

1. a. Is Pa. R.C.P. Rule 233.1 Unconstitutional? b. Is Pa. R.C.P. Rule 233.1 Unconstitutionally Vague?

2. Were Coulter’s Due Process Rights violated?

3. Has pervasive bias (favoring “Justice System” defendants) resulted in the violation of Due Process in the Pennsylvania courts system-wide? i.