Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jay Lawrence Friedheim v. Dane Field
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-16098 · judgment October 24, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether a seaman’s wage contract that includes maintenance and cure entitles the prevailing party to attorney’s fees under Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 257 (1975)?
-
Whether attorney’s fees may be awarded for attempting to collect maintenance and cure from a bankrupt vessel owner and the seaman’s bankrupt employer under Vaughan v. Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527 (1962)?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jay Lawrence Friedheim
Admiralty Advocates
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 30 2020Petition DENIED.
- Mar 11 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
- Jan 22 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)