Michael Ramon Ochoa v. Arthur Levine, et al.

The questions posed in the course of appellate actions at FD-07-000190 were made cognizable by stipulation of all represented parties. Each question should be regarded as if entered here in its entirety.1

Would claims of malpractice, civil conspiracy or 42 Pa.C.S. §8344 Defamation be irreparably lost per Pa.R.A.P. §313(b) Collateral Orders if this appeal is not heard?2

Were those claims adequately protected within the time allowed by service to the late, Hon. Ralph J. Cappy from 01-29-08 to 01-20-09?3

Would the underlying criminal complaints or data supporting those claims be irreparably lost if this appeal is not heard?

Would this perverse outcome further erode Pa. Constitution Article 1§11 or U.S. Constitution Article IV§1?

Do either 18 U.S.C. §1346 or U.S.C. §1961 provide remedy for the problem of Thrasymachus'! Does the #NewOrganonl

Might the interest of justice have been better served if the Hon. David Wecht had participated in this decision?

Could all of this damage be mitigated by ordering the trial court to hear 04-25-19 Amended Complaint?1 1 See attached Exhibit H. Questions or Aporia or https://www.academia.edu/39906428/ Exhibit_H ._Questions_or_Aporia 2 For definitions of malpractice and civil conspiracy see: Ditch v. Waynesboro Hosp., 917 A.2d 317 (Pa. Super. 2007); Weaver v. Franklin County, 918 A.2d 194, 202 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2007), and Reading Radio, Inc. v. Fink, 833 A.2d 199, 212 (Pa.Super. 2003). 3 See attached Exhibit D. Conversations with the Late. Honorable Ralph ,T. Cappv or https:// www.academia.edu/38638818/Conversations_with_the_Late_Honorable_Ralph_J._Cappy 4 See attached Exhibits E-F or download directly at https://www.academia.edu/ 38953832/04-25-19_Amended_Complaint