Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam

IFP petition

Dismissed · October 5, 2020

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lakshmi Arunachalam

For respondent
—

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Nov 09 2020
    Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
  2. Oct 21 2020
    Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
  3. Oct 10 2020
    Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
  4. Oct 05 2020
    The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
  5. Aug 13 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
  6. Jun 15 2020
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2020)