Fernando A. Ramirez v. Dave Hogue, et al.

After a 911 call, the police officer makes a report of what happened; This is electronically recorded and is called CALL FOR SERVICE. This document, being of public interest can be obtained through an application. Both the plaintiff and the defendant have made calls to 911. But only the defendant and his lawyer know of the existence of the CALL FOR SERVICE. On the day of the Trial, the lawyer sends a FALSIFIED or MODIFIED CALL FOR SERVICE into court. But the plaintiff did not notice that, until after the Trial ended. The plaintiff responds to the court with SUPPORT AND EVIDENCE, on the FRAUD of those documents BEFORE the judge makes his verdict. The plaintiff asked the police for ALL copies related to the case, and finds that these were modified, mutilated, and others were deleted from the system. And concludes that the defendant has found the form, or found "someone" who can enter the police computer system, and modify it at will. But the courts ignore this matter and based on the MODIFIED CALL FOR SERVICE, and all that derives from this, fail in favor of the defendants. The question presented is whether courts can ignore what public and important documents such as CALL FOR SERVICE, which have been modified, and others removed from the system; in order to sabotage the lawsuit, be used to take a verdict, without the courts doing the slightest investigation in this regard.