Linda Renae Clark v. Washington

Whether a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights are violated when a public defender fails to independently investigate the criminal charges against their client and subject the prosecution’s test to an adversarial testing.

Whether a judge has a duty to recuse himself once a formal complaint has been filed against him with a governing authority and after a criminal defendant has requested numerous times that he recuse himself.

Whether Polk v. Dodson needs to be reversed OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE Whether the State of Washington violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of indigent criminal defendants by perpetuating the employment of a full-time salaried public defender abusing drugs and unfit for duty when its other full-time salaried employees in the positions of prosecutor, public defender supervisor, and judges knowingly and willingly disregard the State of Washington’s mandatory set of Standards for Indigent Defense Services.

Whether a public defender who is paid as a full-time employee by the state is in violation and/or per se in violation of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights when the public defender intentionally lies to the client about his intention to seek and present evidence of an affirmative defense; thereby committing Fraud/Promissory Fraud.