Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 19-1223 · judgment February 13, 2020
Dismissed · October 5, 2020
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lakshmi Arunachalam
For respondent
James Isbester
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2020The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
- Jul 16 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
- Jul 07 2020Waiver of right of respondent Presidio Bank to respond filed.
- Jun 05 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2020)