Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

S. Patrick Mendel v. UBER Technologies, Inc., et al.

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-16610

Certiorari denied · May 26, 2020

Counsel of record

For petitioner
S. Patrick Mendel

For respondent
Edward Moldavsky
California Public Utilities Commission

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 26 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 06 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
  3. Apr 29 2020
    Waiver of right of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Apr 21 2020
    Waiver of right of respondents Marybel Batjer, Michael Picker, Carla J. Peterman, Liane Randolph, Clifford Rechtschaffen, Martha Guzman Aceves, Genevieve Shiroma, and Maritza Perez to respond filed.
  5. Apr 21 2020
    Waiver of right of respondents Uber Technologies, Inc.; Rasier-CA, LLC; Uber USA, LLC; Travis Kalanick; Garrett Camp; Ryan Graves to respond filed.
  6. Apr 15 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent California Attorney General Xavier Becerra to respond filed.
  7. Mar 18 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2020)