Ben Adam v. William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al.

The Questions Presented are:

1. Did the Second Circuit err in finding that petitioner lacked standing to challenge a criminal statute under the threat of prosecution doctrine, where petitioner openly expressed his intention to violate, for religious purposes, a criminal statute which the government has openly declared its intent to enforce.

2. How are courts to determine whether a particular religious belief/practice qualifies for protection under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and by extension, the First Amendment—an issue dealt with differently by different circuits.