Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Antonio Damarcus Woodson
IFP petition
Dismissed · May 4, 2020
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Antonio D. Woodson
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 04 2020The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
- Apr 16 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
- Feb 26 2020Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)