Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William P. Barr, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 18-60275 · judgment July 18, 2019

Certiorari denied · April 27, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Aaron Michael Streett
Baker Botts, L.L.P.

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
19A395

Proceedings

  1. Apr 27 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 08 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
  3. Apr 07 2020
    Reply of petitioner Jordany Pierre-Paul filed. (Distributed)
  4. Mar 19 2020
    Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General in opposition filed.
  5. Feb 18 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 19, 2020.
  6. Feb 14 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 18, 2020 to March 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Jan 21 2020
    Brief amici curiae of Former Immigration Judges and Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals filed.
  8. Jan 13 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2020.
  9. Jan 10 2020
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 16, 2020 to February 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Dec 16 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2020)
  11. Oct 08 2019
    Application (19A395) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 15, 2019.
  12. Oct 04 2019
    Application (19A395) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 16, 2019 to December 15, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
  13. Oct 04 2019
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and shoiuld not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.