Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Leslie T. Jackson v. District of Columbia
Paid petition · District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 18-AA-950 · judgment March 18, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
IS THE LOWER COURT CLERK AND JUDGE LEGALLY BOUND TO FOLLOW THIS COURTS PRECEDENT AND IN PARTICULAR ITS PRECEDENT IN ARTIS V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 138 S. Ct. 594 (January 22, 2018) AND IN THAT REGARD WILL AN INVOLUNTARY ADMINISTRATIVE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE ON SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION BAR A SUBSEQUENT SIMILAR CASE UNDER THE 30-DAY STATUTE OF LIMITATION IN D.C. Code Chapter 1 § 623.
-
WHETHER A MATERIAL MISTAKE OF FACT, WHICH IMPACTS JURISDICTION, IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS A FINAL DECISION ON THE
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Leslie T. Jackson
For respondent
Carl James Schifferle
D.C. Office of the Attorney General
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, February 24, 2020 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Feb 24 2020Petition DENIED.
- Jan 15 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
- Jan 10 2020Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
- Jun 07 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 10, 2020)