Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Facebook, Inc. v. Nimesh Patel, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-15982 · judgment August 8, 2019
Before the decision, about 6.4× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition, and down for a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Questions presented
-
Whether a court can find Article III standing based on its conclusion that a statute protects a concrete interest, without determining that the plaintiff suffered a personal, real-world injury from the alleged statutory violation.
-
Whether a court can find Article III standing based on a risk that a plaintiff’s personal information could be misused in the future, without concluding that the possibility of misuse is imminent.
-
Whether a court can certify a class without deciding a question of law that is relevant to determining whether common issues predominate under Rule 23. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Neal Kumar Katyal
Milbank LLP
For respondent
Ryan David Andrews
Edelson PC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
3 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Jan 21 2020Petition DENIED.
- Jan 03 2020Brief amicus curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association filed. (Distributed)
- Jan 03 2020Brief amicus curiae of TechFreedom filed.(Distributed)
- Dec 30 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
- Dec 13 2019Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
- Dec 10 2019Waiver of right of respondent Nimesh Patel, et al. to respond filed.
- Dec 02 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2020)