Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lei Ke v. Drexel University
IFP petition · Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, No. 95 EDA 2018 · judgment November 26, 2018
Dismissed · March 23, 2020
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Lei Ke
For respondent
Lois M. Shenk
Cipriani & Werner, P.C.
Proceedings
- Mar 23 2020The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
- Mar 05 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
- Mar 03 2020Reply of petitioner Lei Ke filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 18 2020Brief of respondent Drexel University in opposition filed.
- Jan 15 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2020.
- Jan 13 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2020 to February 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 13 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)
- Nov 07 2019Application (19A494) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 23, 2019.
- Oct 29 2019Application (19A494) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 18, 2019 to December 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.