Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sunil Deo v. California
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, No. D073992 · judgment May 2, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Does California’s application of Penal Code section 115 to deprive lienholders of their property, which conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court precedent holding that similar statutes which extinguish and destroy the value of liens are unconstitutional, constitute an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution?
-
Does California’s application of Penal Code section 115 to void deeds of trust without affording a meaningful hearing that considers an innocent lender’s bona fide encumbrancer status, and which conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court precedent and the laws of other states, constitute a violation of due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ryan Christopher Squire
Garrett & Tully, P.C.
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 24 2020Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by California Land Title Association GRANTED.
- Feb 24 2020Petition DENIED.
- Jan 15 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
- Dec 26 2019Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by California Land Title Association.
- Nov 25 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 2, 2020)