Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Dave Yost, et al. v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 17-3866, 17-3867 · judgment July 25, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Do abortion providers have Article III standing to assert the rights of their patients?
-
When, if ever, does a plaintiff who wins a preliminary injunction, but who never wins a final judgment on the merits, qualify as a “prevailing party” entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Benjamin Michael Flowers
Ashbrook Byrne Kresge Flowers LLC
For respondent
Jennifer Lynn Branch
Gerhardstein & Branch Co LPA
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Jul 02 2020Petition DENIED.
- Jun 29 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.
- Jun 29 2020Supplemental brief of petitioners Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, et al. filed.
- Mar 11 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
- Mar 04 2020Reply of petitioners Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, et al. filed.
- Feb 26 2020Brief of respondents Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, et al. in opposition filed.
- Jan 03 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 27, 2020 to February 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 03 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 26, 2020.
- Dec 26 2019Brief amici curiae of Georgia, et al. filed.
- Dec 12 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2020.
- Dec 11 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2019 to January 27, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Nov 22 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)