Robert J. Wilson v. State Bar of Texas

Introduction: Petitioner contends he was disbarred without no­ tice or opportunity to defend himself by his state bar and then denied access to the Courts for redress when he filed a lawsuit.

1. Can the State of Bar of Texas disbar one of its members without affording him due process of law as guaranteed by its own Rules of Disciplinary Procedure by claiming court created governmental immunity in contradiction of this Court’s Due Process requirements as set forth in: Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114 (1889); Slochower v. Board of Education, 350 U.S 551(1956); In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273 (1948)?

2. Can a State created agency such as this Re­ spondent deny one of its members due process of law as required by this Court in In re Ruffalo, 390 U.S. 544

3. by simply ignoring its own “right to sue” statute and be protected by court created governmental im­ munity?

4. Can a State created agency such as this Re­ spondent deny one of its members due process of law as required by this Court in In re Ruffalo, 390 U.S. 544

5. and Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333,344

6. by simply ignoring its due process requirements in its own Rules of Disciplinary Procedure and be pro­ tected by court created governmental immunity?