Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Antonio Islas-Veloz v. William P. Barr, Attorney General
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 15-73120 · judgment February 4, 2019
Certiorari denied · April 20, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nathaniel Peardon Garrett
Jones Day
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 20 2020Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law Professors GRANTED.
- Apr 20 2020Petition DENIED.
- Apr 08 2020Amicus brief of Amicus Brief of Law Professors in Support of Petition for Write of Certiorari not accepted for filing. (April 08, 2020)
- Apr 01 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
- Apr 01 2020Reply of petitioner Antonio Islas-Veloz filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 13 2020Brief of respondent Barr, William P. in opposition filed.
- Feb 10 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 13, 2020.
- Feb 07 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 14, 2020 to March 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 13 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 14, 2020.
- Jan 10 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 15, 2020 to February 14, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 12 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2020.
- Dec 11 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2019 to January 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 11 2019Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law Professors.
- Nov 14 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)
- Nov 14 2019Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.