Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Thomas F. Sweeney v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 18-1458 · judgment June 14, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The FAA is generally exempted from the Title 5 Personnel Management System, yet FAA employees MSPB Appeal rights are retained. FAA’s employment policy of an Air Traffic Control Specialist - In Training (ATCSTT) whose training was terminated by their Air Traffic Manager (ATM) due to unacceptable performance requires the employee be immediately placed on administrative duties. Through a subsequent process— a national group of FAA officials decide if the employee will be retained as an ATCSTT at a different FAA facility with a lower grade and pay, or initiate separation from Federal Service. If the national group of FAA officials decide to retain the ATCSTT at a lower grade/pay position, the ATCSTT is given a list of 5 or less different facilities to choose from. If the ATCSTT does not choose a facility in the list given to the ATCSTT— per FAA employment policies FAA HRPM 1.14a— the FAA will initiate separation from Federal Service. The questions present are: 1. Is a final decision to terminate the training of a FAA Air Traffic Control Specialist — In Training employee by FAA management— a reduction in grade or removal action based on unacceptable performance, or a major adverse personnel action that is appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board. If no: in the case the ATCSTT is not retained by the FAA’s national group of officials or fails to select a
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Thomas F. Sweeney
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 16 2019Petition DENIED.
- Nov 26 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
- Nov 22 2019Waiver of right of respondent MSPB to respond filed.
- Nov 11 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)