Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Hannah P. v. Joseph Maguire, Acting Director, Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 17-1943 · judgment February 19, 2019


Certiorari denied · March 9, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 6% cert probability (95% interval 4%–9%)

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and counsel who has filed here before.

Question presented

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act generally prohibit employment discrimination against qualified individuals on the basis of disability. 29 U.S.C. § 794(a) and (d); 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a). In applying these federal disability discrimination statutes, the courts of appeals have disagreed with respect to the proper treatment of employment decisions that are based on conduct caused by an employee’s or applicant’s disability. In such cases, which arise with some frequency, the employer will typically contend that the plaintiff’s conduct—often labeled as “misconduct”—is conceptually distinct from the plaintiff’s underlying disability and thus provides a lawful, non-discriminatory basis for the employment action in question. In the decision below, the Fourth Circuit endorsed that purported distinction, which also finds support in the Fifth Circuit’s precedent. Four courts of appeals, however, have reached precisely the opposite conclusion. The question presented is whether an employment decision that is based on conduct caused by a qualified individual’s disability is insulated from scrutiny under the federal disability discrimination statutes on the ground that the decision is not made on the basis of disability. (I)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Mark Thomas Stancil
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
19A307

Proceedings

  1. Mar 09 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 19 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
  3. Feb 18 2020
    Reply of petitioner Hannah P. filed. (Distributed)
  4. Jan 31 2020
    Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
  5. Dec 27 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 31, 2020.
  6. Dec 23 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 30, 2019 to January 31, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Nov 14 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 30, 2019.
  8. Nov 13 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2019 to December 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Oct 23 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 29, 2019)
  10. Sep 18 2019
    Application (19A307) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 23, 2019.
  11. Sep 13 2019
    Application (19A307) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.