Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Michael Lambert v. Estate of Kevin Brown, by its Successor in Interest Rebecca Brown, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-55930 · judgment July 24, 2019


Certiorari denied · February 24, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

San Diego Police Detective Michael Lambert was investigating a 26-year old cold case involving the brutal mutilation and murder of a 14-year old girl. DNA evidence linked a career criminal, Ronald Tatro, and a retired SDPD Criminalist, Kevin Brown, to the murder. Lambert drafted a 39-page search warrant affidavit, and submitted it to a judge who signed the warrant. (Appendix 46-97a.) Nine months after the search, while the investigation was still pending, Kevin Brown committed suicide by hanging himself from a tree. He did not leave a suicide note. His wife, Respondent Rebecca Brown, filed this lawsuit claiming Mr. Brown killed himself because his property was seized and, until the property was returned, he feared he would be arrested for the murder, wrongly convicted and abused in prison. No admissible evidence supports this theory. Mrs. Brown also alleged that Lambert misrepresented and omitted DNA evidence that suggested the presence of Kevin Brown’s sperm DNA on a vaginal swab taken from the murdered girl was the result of contamination. Lambert sought summary judgment based on qualified immunity, contending his actions were objectively reasonable and that he did not make any material misrepresentations or omissions relating to the DNA evidence. The District Court denied the motion; Lambert appealed to the Ninth Circuit. More than eight months after the matter was argued and submitted, the Ninth Circuit affirmed, with no analysis and little elaboration. This petition presents the following questions: 1. Did the Ninth Circuit err by failing to address whether a reasonable officer in Detective

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Catherine Ann Richardson
SAN DIEGO CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

For respondent
Eugene G. Iredale
Iredale and Yoo, APC

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 24 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 15 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
  3. Jan 09 2020
    Reply of petitioner Michael Lambert filed.
  4. Dec 26 2019
    Brief of respondents Estate of Kevin Brown, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Oct 29 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 26, 2019.
  6. Oct 25 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2019 to December 26, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Oct 21 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)