Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Otis B. Brascom
IFP petition
Dismissed · October 7, 2019
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Otis Brascom
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
- Sep 05 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 17 2019Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2019)